skip to main |
skip to sidebar
I'm a bit of a closet Mitsubishi fan. My very first car was a 1979 Lancer fastback, and the brand has always done things that quietly impressed me. But everything they did felt like it could have been better still. (The pillarless Magna, the Triton, the capped-price servicing, to name but a few.)
The all new Mitsubishi Outlander continues that theme. In each generation of model variant, you look for and expect the car to feel like better version of the last. I felt that in my last article on the Hyundai i30. I felt it recently in the new Opel Astra. The thing about the Outlander is that it feels newer, like it has lots of technology and stuff for the salespeople to point at, but to the detriment of the car.
The CVT gearbox, which literally means Constant Variable Transmission (don't think about the name for too long), is just as shit as it's even been in any car, ever. Much like the transmission in the old Honda HRV my mother owned, it feels like a metal box filled with rubber bands that are controlled by the processor of an early Motorola Razr flip-phone. It's clunky, unintuitive, and absolutely fucking pointless when we have a century of R&D that makes conventional automatic transmissions infinitely superior.
The interior is a bizarre mix of excellent quality and very poor quality. The woodgrain in the Aspire model tested is actually quite good, but the centre dash uses an inconsistent piano black trim instead, surrounded by cheap plastic. The steering wheel is too thin and the leather too cheap, but the switches are great. The indicator stalk is not. I like the Rockford Fosgate stereo, but the super-bright screen for the grainy reverse camera almost blew my head off when I was in a dark car park at night.
Out on the road, the Outlander continued the theme of excelling in some areas and being really strangely bad in areas where it should be good. I like stiff suspension in my cars as it provides better feedback, and feedback means more information to the driver. The Outlander's front-end is stiffer than a teenage boy in a tittie bar, yet somehow provides absolutely no feedback through the incredibly odd steering. It felt like the steering box was made of cardboard. I've never felt anything like it and I absolutely hated it. The headlights are perfect. What truly surprised me, though, was how well this thing corners. The Electronic Stability Control is subtle and ensures the car is where-ever you want the front-end to point. The brakes and Electronic Brake Distribution work effectively. The engine is asthmatic and should be used in portable generators only. The ECO and 4WD buttons are laughable.
With Mitsubishi dropping their 10-year drivetrain warranty on their new cars, there's less incentive to buy one of their cars. Once you drive the all new Outlander, the incentive is almost nil. Bizarre is the word that keeps jumping in my head when I think of the latest Mitsubishi Outlander. It's like they've started with the old model, pop-riveted a bunch of new technological gadgets that they bought from eBay onto the car, and failed to drive it to see if any of it actually made the car better. If you're looking for a soft-roader, either get an ix35, or wait for the new Rav4 to arrive.
The 2011 Australian International Motor Show. The impressive-sounding name almost implies that our market is respected by international automobile manufacturers. The unfortunate truth is that we're not. We get the old concept cars that have already done the rounds for the past year, and if we're lucky, we might get a left-hand-drive version of some model we probably won't ever see on our roads. This year was a prime example.
Not only that, but we only get the Motor Show in Melbourne once every two years now, as we alternate with Sydney because of financial concerns the car makers had. I can deal with that, though, as an annual show of the same cars does get a bit tedious.
But when my most anticipated manufacturer, BMW, doesn't bother to bring any cars that are on sale, I get annoyed. Their special eco-hybrid concept car thing, which came out ages ago, is not particularly interesting. I'm not allowed to sit it in, I'm not going to be buying the thing in the next couple of years, so it's really only a study in car design. Yes, it's a nice concept car, but it's not real. And that's what the Motor Show should be about.
We all read the specs in the magazines, look at the pictures, and watch the videos on YouTube. But the Motor Show is where you get to sit in and feel what each car is really like. Of course, it's not quite as good as driving them, but you're able to experience the ergonomics, the seating position, the slickness of the gearshifter, and the quality of the leather and plastics.
The new Range Rover Evoque was impressive, and as it's based on the Freelander2 that I so enjoyed, I imagine will be a cracking drive, too. As cool as it was, with Recaro-esque seats (without the bolstering), leather-trimmed dash, and huge moon-roof, the price-tag is still far too hefty for my liking. The Sport we looked at had two doors and was $127,000. Poor value.
The Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart was good value when compared to the Evolution that sat next to it (if you made it to the top of the stairs without a sherpa). But drop the extra $10k on a Volkswagen Golf R, with real, thigh-bruising bolstering, blows the idea of the Lancer right out of the water.
Audi's R8 Spyder continues to be one of the most beautiful supercars on sale. The Audi designers should teach the Lamborghini designers what a curve is.
Mercedes-Benz had their new C63 coupe alongside their new CLS63 and SLS. The CLS was the most striking in it's red bodywork with big black wheels and beautifully designed interior. However, the SLS didn't draw on my emotions like the original 300SL Gullwing at the other end of the building. Most people walked past the "new" SLK without realising it was there. Mercedes-Benz will have a hard time against the Z4.
Despite not having many models for sale in Australia, Skoda put on a good show, even allowing people to sit in their (real!) rally car, which was nice. They continue to surge forward in Australia with ever-growing confidence.
Holden and Ford continue to copy everyone else as well as themselves (both releasing Black Editions, really?). At least FPV is learning that the subtler, the better.
There were a number of things I took with me after I'd left the Show this year. The first was that I was utterly disappointed that there was no BMW stand. No M3 Pure, no 1M, no M5. The second was the feel of the Mercedes-Benz G-Class, which, in my mind, won the award for best supporting actor. I loved how agricultural and secure the doors felt and how they didn't feel like doors on any other car at the show. My final thought was how I still yearn for a Maserati Quattroporte GTS. They are one of the most magnificently looking and sounding cars in the modern era.
